Klinická farmakologie a farmacie – 2/2020
www.klinickafarmakologie.cz / Klin Farmakol Farm 2020; 34(2): 47–55 / KLINICKÁ FARMAKOLOGIE A FARMACIE 55 HLAVNÍ TÉMA Terapeutické monitorování léčiv – review címúčinkům) a nastavení referenčních rozmezí je často teprve úkolem do budoucnosti. Závěr Terapeutické monitorování léčiv bývá ozna čováno jako „klíč“ personalizované farmakote rapie řady onemocnění. Jedná se o specifickou metodu oboru klinická farmakologie, jejímž základním předpokladem je existence užšího vztahu mezi farmakologickým účinkem léčiva a jeho koncentrací v organismu než s jeho dáv kou. Správně provedené TDM pomůže pomocí stanovení koncentrace léčiva v krvi následované erudovanou interpretací klinickým farmakolo gem (případně farmaceutem) a zpětnou vazbou s indikujícím klinikem nastavit optimální dávku léčiva u konkrétního pacienta, což umožní ra cionalizaci farmakoterapie s minimalizací rizika výskytu nežádoucích účinků, snížení mortality i morbidity, snížení nákladů na léčebnou péči a zejména zlepšení kvality života pacienta. LITERATURA 1. Eliasson E, Lindh JD, Malmström RE, Beck O, Dahl ML. The rapeutic drug monitoring for tomorrow. Eur J Clin Pharma col 2013; 69(1): 25–32. 2. Grundmann M, Kacířová I. Význam TDM, fenotypizace a genotypizace pro správné dávkování léčiv. Čas Lék čes 2010; 149: 482–487. 3. Dave V, Yadav RB, Yadav S, Sharma S, Sahu RK, Ajayi AF. A cri tique of computer simulation software’s used in pharmacoki netics and pharmacodynamics analysis. Curr Clin Pharmacol 2018; 13(4): 216–235. 4. Kacířová I, Grundmann M. TDM antibiotik v klinické praxi. Kardiol Rev Int Med 2015; 17(1): 57–64. 5. Kacířová I, Grundmann M. Terapeutické monitorování ami kacinu a gentamicinu v rutinní klinické praxi. Vnitř Lék 2015; 61(1): 33–41. 6. Abdul‑Aziz MH, Alffenaar JC, Bassetti M, et al. Antimicro bial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: a Position Paper [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 7]. Intensive Care Med 2020; 1–27. 7. Suchánková H, Matušková Z, Vanduchová A. Terapeutické monitorování beta‑laktamových antibiotik. Klin mikrobiol inf lék 2017; 23(1): 4–9. 8. Ben Romdhane H, Ben Fredj N, Chaabane A, et al. Inte rest of therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides administered by a monodose regimen. Nephrol Ther 2019; 15(2): 110–114. 9. Young DC, Zobell JT, Stockmann C, et al. Optimization of anti‑pseudomonal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations:V. Aminoglycosides. Pediatr Pulmonol 2013; 48: 1047–1061. 10. Avent ML, Rogers BA, Cheng AC, Paterson DL. Current use of aminoglycosides: indications, pharmacokinetics and monitoring for toxicity. Intern Med J 2011; 41(6): 441–449. 11. MooreRD,LietmanPS,SmithCR.Clinicalresponsetoamino glycosidetherapy: importanceoftheratioofpeakconcentration tominimal inhibitoryconcentration.J InfectDis1987;155:93–99. 12. Boyer A, Gruson D, Bouchet S, et al. Aminoglycosides in septic shock: an overview, with specific consideration gi ven to their nephrotoxic risk. Drug Saf 2013; 36(4): 217–230. 13. Alqahtani S, Alhumoud A, Abushomi H, Alsultan A, Bal khi B. Appropriate therapeutic drug monitoring of antibio tics contributed to lower nephrotoxicity. Int J Clin Pharma col Ther 2020 Feb; 58(2): 82–88. 14. Thomson AH, Staatz CE, Tobin CM, Gall M, Lovering AM. Development and evaluation of vancomycin dosage guide lines designed to achieve new target concentrations. J Anti microb Chemother 2009; 63(5): 1050–1057. 15. Moise‑Broder PA, Forrest A, Birmingham MC, Schentag JJ. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicro bials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respira tory tract infections. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004; 43: 925–942. 16. Rybak MJ, Lomaestro BM, Rotschafer JC, et al. Vancomycin therapeutic guidelines: a summary of consensus recommen dations from the infectious diseases Society of America, the American Society of Health‑System Pharmacists, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49(3): 325–327. 17. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, et al. Clinical practice guide lines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin‑resistant Staphylococcus aureus in fections in adults and children: Executive summary. Clin In fect Dis 2011; 52(3): 285–292. 18. Helgason KO, Thomson AH, Ferguson C. A review of van comycin therapeutic drug monitoring recommendations in Scotland. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 61(6): 1398–1399. 19. Abdul‑Aziz MH, Lipman J, Roberts JA. Identifying „at‑risk“ patients for sub‑optimal beta‑lactam exposure in critically ill patients with severe infections. Crit Care 2017; 21: 21(1): 283. 20. Roberts JA, Paul SK, Akova M, et al. DALI: Defining Anti biotic Levels in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Are Current β ‑Lactam Antibiotic Doses Sufficient for Critically Ill Patients? Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58(8): 1072–1083. 21. Delattre IK, Taccone FS, Jacobs F, et al. Optimizing β ‑lactams treatment in critically‑ill patients using pharmacoki netics/pharmacodynamics targets: are first conventional do ses effective? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2017; 15(7): 677–688. 22. Patsalos PN, Spencer EP, Berry DJ. Therapeutic Drug Mo nitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs in Epilepsy: A 2018 Update. Ther Drug Monit 2018; 40(5): 526–548. 23. Grundmann M, Kacířová I. Terapeutické monitorování hladin antiepileptik I. – obecné zásady, „stará“ antiepilepti ka. Klin Farmakol Farm 2016; 30(2): 9–15. 24. Kacířová I, Grundmann M. Terapeutické monitorování hla din antiepileptik II. - „nová“ antiepileptika, speciální skupiny pacientů. Klin Farmakol Farm 2016; 30(2): 16–22. 25. Reimers A, Berg JA, Burns ML, Brodtkorb E, Johannessen SI, Johannessen Landmark C. Reference ranges for antiepi leptic drugs revisited: a practical approach to establish na tional guidelines. Drug Des Devel Ther 2018; 12: 271–280. 26. Hiemke C, Bergemann N, Clement HW, et al. Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsy chopharmacology: Update 2017. Pharmacopsychiatry 2018; 51(1–02): 9–62. 27. The Digitalis Investigation Group. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 525–533. 28. Rathore SS, Curtis JP, Wang Y, et al. Association of serum digoxin concentration and outcomes in patients with heart failure. JAMA 2003; 289: 871–878. 29. Ahmed A, Waagstein F, Pitt B, et al. Effectiveness of di goxin in reducing one‑year mortality in chronic heart fai lure in the Digitalis Investigation Group trial. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103(1): 82–87. 30. Grundmann M, Kacířová I. Personalizovaná farmakotera pie digoxinem. Vnitř Lék 2015; 61(5): 406–409. 31. Lopes RD, Rordorf R, De Ferrari GM, et al; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Digoxin and Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 13; 71(10): 1063–1074. 32. Moffett BS, Garner A, Zapata T, Orcutt J, Niu M, Lopez KN. Serum digoxin concentrations and clinical signs and symp toms of digoxin toxicity in the paediatric population. Cardiol Young 2016; 26: 498–493. 33. Park M. Congestive heart failure. In: Park MK, (ed) Pedi atric Cardiology for Practitioners, (4 th ed) St Louis: Mosby; 2002: 403–406. 34. Gabarin N, Jaeggi ET, Spears DA, Sermer M, Silversides CK, Bhagra CJ. Concurrent maternal and fetal tachyarrhythmia in pregnancy. Obstet Med 2017; 10(4): 195–197. 35. Grundmann M, Koristkova B, Brozmanova H, Kaciro va I, Komzakova I. The interaction between digoxin and amiodarone during routine TDM. Ther Drug Monit 2005; 27(2): 219–220. 36. Hrudikova Vyskocilova E, Grundmann M, Duricova J, Kaci rova I. Therapeutic monitoring of amiodarone: pharmacoki netics and evaluation of the relationship between effect and dose/concentration. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olo mouc Czech Repub 2017 Jun; 161(2): 134–143. 37. Bellmann R, Smuszkiewicz P. Pharmacokinetics of antifun gal drugs: practical implications for optimized treatment of patients. Infection 2017 Dec; 45(6): 737–779. 38. Stott KE, Hope WW. Therapeutic drug monitoring for in vasive mould infections and disease: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations. J Antimicrob Chemo ther 2017; 72: i12–i18. 39. Ullmann AJ, Aguado JM, Arikan‑Akdagli S, et al. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: executive summa ry of the 2017 ESCMID‑ECMM‑ERS guideline. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018 May; 24 Suppl 1: e1–e38. 40. Arendrup MC, Cuenca‑Estrella M, Lass‑Flörl C, Hope WW. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST ‑AFST). EUCAST technical note on Aspergillus and ampho tericin B, itraconazole, and posaconazole. Clin Microbiol In fect 2012; 18: E248–250. 41. Yi WM, Schoeppler KE, Jaeger J, et al. Voriconazole and posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring: a ret rospective study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017 Sep 11; 16(1): 60. 42. Shuker N, van Gelder T, Hesselink DA. Intra‑patient varia bility in tacrolimus exposure: Causes, consequences for cli nical management. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2015; 29: 78–84. 43. Snanoudj R, Rabant M, Royal V, Pallet N, Noel LH, Le gendre C. Nephrotoxicite des inhibiteurs de la calcineurine: presentation, problemes diagnostiques et facteurs de ris ques (Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors: presentation, diagnostic problems and risk factors). Nephrol Ther 2009; 5(Suppl 6): S365–370. 44. del Mar Fernandez De Gatta M, Santos‑Buelga D, Dominguez‑Gil A, Garcia MJ. Immunosuppressive therapy for paediatric transplant patients: pharmacokinetic conside rations. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41(2): 115–135. 45. Viklický O. Imunosuprese po transplantaci ledviny. Klinic ká farmakologie a farmacie. 2010; 24(2): 98–102. 46. Konsenzus IKEM; https://www2.ikem.cz/plm_lp/HVEZ DAADCG.htm; 6. 2. 2020. 47. Teřl M, Čáp P, Dvořáková R, et al. Doporučený postup dia gnostiky a léčby bronchiálního astmatu. Semily: GEUM; 2015. 48. http://www.sukl.cz/modules/medication/search.php; 4. 2. 2020. 49. Cooney L, Hawcutt D, Sinha I. The Evidence for Intrave nous Theophylline Levels between 10–20 mg/L in Children Suffering an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma: A Systematic Re view. PLoS One 2016 Apr 20; 11(4): e0153877.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NDA4Mjc=