Klin Farmakol Farm. 2007;21(2):67-73

Fever of Unknown Origin in Patients with Neutropenia (so-called Febrile Neutropenia)

Petr Cetkovský
Klinický úsek, Ústav hematologie a krevní transfuze, Praha

In recent 30 years we were able to reduce mortality of the patients with febrile neutropenia (fever of unknown origin – FUO). This was particularly due to modern antiinfective drugs, new diagnostic tools, new prognostic models enabeling risk stratification of the patients. There has been developed new guidelines for quick therapy initiation. So antibiotics (ATBs), which are still basic stone of FUO treatment, can be promply and aproprietly administered. This is really important in fact, that FUO is one of the most important and emergent situation in very hematologic patients. There is also one important change in the politics of ATB administration in recent year, which mean, that glycopeptide ATBs are used only after proper cultivation, not just in persistent fever. To our advantage, now we have got new ATBs and antimycotics, which are less toxic and more eficatious. In context with modern ATBs, there is wide range of new multiresistant nosocomial flora, which is really increasing problem. We hope, that in future, there would be new rapid laboratory tests, that would not only be based on cultivation method. And due to this test we could have been able to detect mainly mycotic infection and treat this infection in pre-emptive, not only empiric way. Despite of progress in this field, there is still much to do in diagnosis and treatment of FUO.

Keywords: febrile neutropenia, granulocytopenia, antiinfective treatment, glycopeptide ATBs, antimycotics, multiresistant nosocomial flora, empiric therapy, pre-emptive therapy

Published: October 1, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cetkovský P. Fever of Unknown Origin in Patients with Neutropenia (so-called Febrile Neutropenia). Klin Farmakol Farm. 2007;21(2):67-73.
Download citation

References

  1. Sipsas NV, Bodey GP, Kontoyiannis DP. Perspectives for the Management of Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Cancer in the 21st Century. Cancer 2005; 103: 1103-1110. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Grawford J, Dale DC, Lyman GH. Chemotherapy - induced neutropenia. Cancer 2004; 100: 228-237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Sickles EA, Greene WH, Wiernik PH. Clinical presentation of infection in granulocytopenic patients. Arch Intern Med 1975; 135: 715-719. Go to original source...
  4. Chrischilles E, Link B, Scott S, Delgado DJ, Fridman M. Factors associated with early termination of CHOP, and its association with overall survival among patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)(abstract 1539). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002; 21: 385a.
  5. Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, et al. 2002 Guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 730-751. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Klener P. Infekční komplikace. In Klener P: Klinická onkologie, Galén 2002, Praha, 291-294.
  7. Mayer J. Teplota nejasného významu. In Cetkovský P et al.: Intenzivní péče v hematologii, Galén 2004, 348-353.
  8. Ráčil Z. Prevence septických komplikací u dospělých nemocných s funkčním hyposplenismem a po splenektomii. Vnitřní lékařství 2001; 47: 781-789. Go to PubMed...
  9. Cetkovský P. Příklad strategie antiinfekční terapie u neutropenických nemocných. Změny hodnot tělesné teploty. In Cetkovský P et al.: Intenzivní péče v hematologii, Galén 2004, 3494-497, 165-168.
  10. Klener P, Vorlíček J (editoři). Podpůrná léčba v onkologii. Praha, Galén 1998, 231 s.
  11. Klener P. Změny tělesné teploty. In Klener P et al. Vnitřní lékařství. Galén 2006, Praha, 23-26.
  12. Rolston KVI, Raad J, Whimbey E, Bodey GP. The changing spectrum of bacterial infections in febrile neutropenic patients. In: Klastersky JA, editor. Febrile neutropenia. Berlin: SpringerVerlag 1997; 53-56. Go to original source...
  13. Wisplinghoff H, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Current trends in epidemiology of nosocomial bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies and solid neoplasms in hospitals in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 1003-1110. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Yadegarynia D, Tarrand J, Raad I, Rolston K. Current spectrum of bacterial infections in patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 37: 1144-1145. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Chatzinikolaou I, Abi-Said D, Bodey GP, Rolston KV, Tarrand JJ, Samonis G. Recent experience with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in patients with cancer: retrospective analysis of 245 episodes. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 501-509. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Engels EA, Lau J, Barza M. Efficacy of quinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 1179-1187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Cordonnier C, Buzyn A, Leverger G, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for Gram-positive coccal infections in neutropenia. Toward a more targeted antibiotic strategy. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 149-158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Collin BA, Leather HL, Wingard JR, Ramphal R. Evolution, incidence, and susceptibility of bacterial bloodstream isolates from 519 bone marrow transplant patients. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 947-953. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Fainstein V, Elting LS, Bodey GP. Bacteremia caused by non-sporulating anaerobes in cancer patients. A 12 year experience. Medicine (Baltimore) 1989; 68: 151-162. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Elting LS, Bodey GP, Keefe BH. Septicemia and shock syndrome due to viridans streptococci: a case-control study of predisposing factors. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 14: 1202-1207. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Hachem RY, Rice L, Hanna H et al. Molecular patterns of decreased vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) susceptibility to linezolid associated with clinical use (abstract 216). 41st Annual Meeting of Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). San Diego: Infectious Diseases Society of America 2003.
  22. Kontoyiannis DP, Reddy BT, Hanna H, Bodey GP, Tarrand J, Raad II. Breakthrough candidemia in patients with cancer differs from de novo candidemia in host factors and Candida species but not intensity. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002; 23: 542-545. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Torres HA, Rivero GA, Lewis RE, Hachem R, Raad II, Kontoyiannis DP. Aspergillosis caused by non-fumigatus Aspergillus species: risk factors and in vitro susceptibility compared with Aspergillus fumigatus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 46: 25-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Raad I, Hanna HA, Alakech B, Chatzinikolaou I, Johnson MM, Tarrand J. Differential time to positivity: a useful method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 18-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Talcott JA, Siegel RD, Finberg R, Goldman L. Risk assessment in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia: a prospective, two-center validation of a prediction rule. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 316-321. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB et al. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer Risk Index: a multinational scoring system for identify low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3038-3051. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Del Favero A, Menichetti F, Martino P et al. A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing piperacillin/tazobactam with and without amikacin as empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 1295-1301. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Rolston KV, Berkey P, Bodey GP et al. A comparison of imipenem to ceftazidime with or without amikacin as empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 283-291. Go to original source...
  29. Feld R, DePauw B, Berman S et al. Meropenem versus ceftazidime in the treatment of cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 3690-3698. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Raad II, Escalante C, Hachem RY et al. Treatment of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer who require hospitalization: a prospective randomized study comparing imipenem and cefepime. Cancer 2003; 98: 1039-1047. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Giamarellou H, Bassaris HP, Petrikkos G et al. Monotherapy with intravenous followed by oral high dose ciprofloxacín versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as inital empiric therapy for granulocytopenic patients with fever. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44: 3264-3271. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Paul M, Soares-Weiser K, Leibovici L. Beta lactam monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy for fever with neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2003; 326: 1111-1119. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Elting LS, Cantor Sb. Outcomes and costs of febrile neutropenia: adventures in the science and art of treatment choices. Support Care Cancer 2002; 10: 189-196. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. European Organization for Research nad Treatment of cancor (EORTC) International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group. Vancomycin added to empirical combiantion antibiotic therapy for fever in granulocytopenic cancer patiens. J Infect Dis 1991; 163: 951-958. Go to original source...
  35. Feld R. Vancomycin as part of initial empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile neutropenia in patients with cancer: pros and cons. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29: 503-507. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Nijhuis CO, Kamps WA, Daenen SMG et al. Feasibility of withholding antibiotics in selected febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 7437-7444. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.