Klin Farmakol Farm. 2008;22(3):118-122

Evaluation of prescribing‘s quality

Michal Prokeš
INFOPHARM a.s., Praha

Physicians always do not prescribe drugs in optimal, therefore they should be provided by feed-back by means of evaluation of their prescribing habbits. This evaluation is based on drug statistics, which can identify drug related problems which can be present in prescriptions issued by individual physician, eg. suboptimal choice of antibiotics, clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, drugs potentially harmfull to seniors, etc. In this paper pharmacotherapeutical committees in Netherlands are mentioned as well as methods, by which rational pharmacotherapy is supported, which are successfully used in developed countries of Europe. From their experiences it is evident, that in every country rational prescribing should be supported and which methods can be used.

Keywords: Key words: evaluation of drug prescribing, quality indicators, pharmacotherapeutical committees.

Published: January 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Prokeš M. Evaluation of prescribing‘s quality. Klin Farmakol Farm. 2008;22(3):118-122.
Download citation

References

  1. Dening P. The Decision Process of the Prescribing Physician. In: Bakker A, Buurma H, Hekster YA, Leufkens HG. Drug consumptionin the Netherlands, Volume 2, Utrecht 1997: 23-26.
  2. Dening P, Haiijer-Ruskamp F. Investigating Decision-making by Prescribers. In: United Kingdom Drug Utilisation Research Group: Handbook of Drug Use Research Methodology, 1st Edition, 2000: 70-87.
  3. Paes AHP. Pharmacy and Therapeutic Committees in the Netherlands. In: Bakker A, Buurma H, Hekster YA, Leufkens HG. Drug consumption in the Netherlands, Volume 2, Utrecht 1997: 37-48.
  4. de Vries CS. Feedback on Prescribing. In: Bakker A, Buurma H, Hekster YA, Leufkens HG. Drug consumption in the Netherlands, Volume 2, Utrecht 1997: 49-66.
  5. Haiijer-Ruskamp. Measuring effects of interventions to improve prescribing; sdělení na konferenci EURODURG 2001 (Praha, 7.-9. června 2001).
  6. Mason A, Towse A, Drummond M, Cooke J. Influencing prescribing in a primary care; LED NHS, Office of Health Economics, 2002.
  7. Richards D, Toop L, Graham P: Do clinical practice education groups result in sustained change in GP prescribing? Family Practice 2003; Vol. 20, 199-206. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Berg van den, Bergman U: Improving drug prescribing by use of quality indicators and feed back; sdělení na konferenci EURODURG 2001 (Praha, 7.-9. června 2001).
  9. Perlík F, Kubica Z, Štika L. Hodnocení spotřeby léků při zavádění pozitivních listů. Časopis lékařů českých 1999; 138: 56-58. Go to PubMed...
  10. http://www.rivm.nl/earss/
  11. http://www.esac.ua.ac.be
  12. http://durg.org/workgr/happy_audit.htm




Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.