Klin Farmakol Farm. 2011;25(1):11-17

Comparison of branded and generic lots of carbapenem antibiotics

Karel Urbánek, Michal Šiller, Rostislav Večeřa, Alice Zachařová, Zuzana Matušková
Ústav farmakologie Lékařské fakulty Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci

Background: Carbapenem antibiotics are used in severe nosocomial infections, so the quality of their different preparations has been

emphasized.

Aim: A comparison of the quality of generic imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem produced by Fresenius Kabi with the branded preparations.

Methods: 3 commercially available lots of generic preparations (Imipenem/cilastatin Kabi® and Meropenem Kabi®) were compared with

one branded lot of each carbapenem (Tienam® and Meronem®). Concentrations of active agents were measured by HPLC analysis with

spectrophotometric detection. Impurity or degradation product content, concentration of active agent in preparation dissolved for use,

stability of dissolved preparation and plasma concentrations following intraperitoneal administration to laboratory rats were measured.

Results: Concentrations of the active agents in all tested lots have not significantly varied. Impurities or degradation products were not

found in any of the tested lots. All tested preparations were sufficiently stable at temperatures up to 26 °C in 6-hour interval. Plasma

concentrations in experimental rats in 20, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min. following intraperitoneal administration have not varied significantly,

as well as the AUC in 0–4 hours.

Conclusions: Conformity of the tested generic lots with branded preparations was proved in all assessed parameters.

Keywords: imipenem, meropenem, high-performance liquid chromatography, pharmacokinetics, stability, purity

Published: March 18, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Urbánek K, Šiller M, Večeřa R, Zachařová A, Matušková Z. Comparison of branded and generic lots of carbapenem antibiotics. Klin Farmakol Farm. 2011;25(1):11-17.
Download citation

References

  1. Finch R. Generic antibiotics, antibiotic resistance, and drug licensing. Lancet Infect Dis 2010; 10(9): 597-602. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Jones RN, Fritsche TR, Moet GJ. In vitro potency evaluations of various piperacillin/tazobactam generic products compared with the contemporary branded (Zosyn, Wyeth) formulation. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008; 61(1): 76-79. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Moet GJ, Watters AA, Sader HS, Jones RN. Expanded studies of piperacillin/tazobactam formulations: variations among branded product lots and assessment of 46 generic lots. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009; 65(3): 319-322. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Vojtová V. Komentář ke článku: Expanded studies of piperacillin/tazobactam formulations: variations among branded product lots and assessment of 46 generic lots. Klin Farmakol Farm 2010; 24(4): 220.
  5. Zhanel GG, Wiebe R, Dilay L, et al. Comparative review of the carbapenems. Drugs 2007; 67(7): 1027-1052. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Deshpande AD, Baheti KG a Chatterjee NR. Degradation of ?-lactam antibiotics. Current science 2004; 87(12): 1684-1695.
  7. Mendez A, Chagastelles P, Palma E, Nardi N, Schapoval E. Thermal and alkaline stability of meropenem: Degradation products and cytotoxicity. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2008; 350: 95-102. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Šiller M, Lipš M, Urbánek K. Stanovení plazmatických koncentrací imipenemu. Klin Farmakol Farm 2010; 24(3): 121-123.
  9. Garcia-Capdevila L, López-Calull C, Arroyo C, Moral MA, Mangues MA, Bonal J. Determination of imipenem in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography for pharmacokinetic studies in patients. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1997; 692(1): 127-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Gravallese DA, Musson DG, Pauliukonis LT, Bayne WF. Determination of imipenem (N-formimidoyl thienamycin) in human plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography, comparison with microbiological methodology and stability. J Chromatogr 1984; 310(1): 71-84. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Jaruratanasirikul S, Sudsai T. Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of imipenem in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia following administration by 2 or 0.5 h infusion. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 63(3): 560-563. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Jaruratanasirikul S, Sriwiriyajan S, Punyo J. Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of meropenem in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia following administration by 3-h infusion or bolus injection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 1337-1339. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Moon YS, Chung KC, Gill MA. Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in animals, healthy volunteers, and patients. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24(Suppl 2): S249-S255. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Lamoth F, Buclin T, Csajka C, Pascual A, Calandra T, Marchetti O. Reassessment of recommended imipenem doses in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53(2): 785-787. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Roberts JA, Ulldemolins M, Roberts MS, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactams in critically ill patients: proof of concept. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2010; 36(4): 332-339. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Piyasirisilp S, Premprawat W, Thamlikitkul V. Therapeutic equivalence of generic imipenem/cilastatin for therapy of infections at Siriraj Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2010; 93(Suppl 1): S117-S125. Go to PubMed...




Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.