Klin Farmakol Farm. 2011;25(3):116-121

Dosage of vancomycin during continuous renal replacement therapy

Jana Zahálková1,2, Jan Strojil3, Naděžda Petejová4, Karel Urbánek3, Milan Grundmann5, Ivana Kacířová5
1 III. interní klinika LF UP a FN Olomouc
2 Hemodialyzační oddělení nemocnice Šternberk, Středomoravská nemocniční a.s.
3 Ústav farmakologie LF UP a FN Olomouc
4 Interní klinika FN a LF OU Ostrava
5 Oddělení klinické farmakologie FN a LF OU Ostrava

The aim of the study: To analyze the influence of continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) on efficacy of vancomycin dosage in

critically ill septic patients (pts). Using pharmacokinetic modelling we tried to find an individual dosing regimen for the first day and to

optimize pts´ chance of achieving sufficient AUC/MIC90 values.

Method: We investigated 15 septic pts with acute renal injury on CVVH,

who were treated with vancomycin either 1.0 g every 12 hours (stage I – injury, n = 9) or 1.0 every 24 hours (stage F – failure, n = 6).

CVVH was performed with high-flux polysulfone membrane, filtration rate 45 ml/kg b.w./h. and pre- postdilution mode of substitution

(50 %/50 %). Using serum vancomycin concentration measurements at hour 1., 6. and at the end of dosing interval, we analyzed the

achieved AUCs in relationship to MIC90 of identified causative pathogens. Pharmacokinetic modelling in MW Pharm 4.0 was performed.

Two boosted dosing regimens were modelled: shortening the dosing interval and increasing the first loading dose.

Results: Only 4 pts

(27 %) maintained trough levels above the recommended minimum of 10 mg/l at the end of the first day (1 stage I, 3 stage F), however,

12 of 15 (80 %) pts achieved sufficient AUC/MIC90 ≥ 400 for their identified pathogen. Stage F pts were more likely to reach trough levels

(50 % vs. 11 %) and AUC/MIC90 (100 % vs. 67 %). When an MIC90 of 1.0 mg/l was considered, only 4 pts (27 %) would achieve effective AUC/

MIC90 on the first day. For MIC90 of ≥ 2.0 mg/l, none of the pts would attain sufficient AUC/MIC90. Shortening the dosing interval from 12

to 8 hours and from 24 to 12 hours increased chances of achieving sufficient AUC/MIC90 from 27 % to 87 % for MIC90 of 1.0 mg/l. Increasing

the loading dose by an extra 0.5 g had the same effect. Neither boosted dosing was sufficient for MIC90 ≥ 2.0 mg/l in any of the pts.

Conclusions: Current vancomycin dosing recommendations for critically ill patients on CVVH fail to achieve target trough levels on Day

1. The resulting AUC/MIC90 is sufficient only for pathogens with low MIC90. Boosted loading dose can increase efficacy for MIC90 = 1.0

but fails if it is ≥ 2.0 mg/l. More aggressive loading doses should be used in critically ill septic patients on CVVH to achieve adequate

therapeutic exposure during this critical time period.

Keywords: vancomycin, therapeutic drug monitoring, sepsis, acute kidney injury, continuous renal replacement therapy

Published: December 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zahálková J, Strojil J, Petejová N, Urbánek K, Grundmann M, Kacířová I. Dosage of vancomycin during continuous renal replacement therapy. Klin Farmakol Farm. 2011;25(3):116-121.
Download citation

References

  1. Kuang D, Verbine A, Ronco C. Pharmacokinetics and antimicrobial dosing adjustment in critically ill patients during continuous renal replacement therapy. Clinical Nephrology 2007; 67 (5): 267-284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Trotman RL, Willimson JC, Shoemaker DM, Salzer WL. Antibiotic dosing in critically ill adult patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Clinical Practice 2005; 41: 1159-1166. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Rybak MJ. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2006; 42 (Suppl 1): 35-39. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Moellering, RC Jr. Vancomycin: a 50-years reassessment. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42 (Suppl 1): 3-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Soriano A, Marco F, Martínez JA, et al. Influence of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2008; 46: 193-200. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Rybak M, Lomaestro B, Rotschafer JC, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American society of health-system pharmacists, the Infectious diseases society of America, and the Society of infectious diseases pharmacists. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2009; 66: 82-98. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Bouchard J, Soroko SB, Chertow GM, et al. Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2009, 76: 422-427. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Murray PT, Liu KD. Acute kidney injury and critical care nephrology: management of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. NephSAP 2011; 10 (3): 242-247.
  9. Nakamura M, Oda S, Sadahiro T, et al. Treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock by CHDF using a PMMA membrane hemofilter as a cytokine modulator. In Suzuki H, Hirasawa H. Acute blood purification.Contributions to nephrology, vol. 166, Karger 2010: 73-82. Go to original source...
  10. Matějovič M, Raděj J. Dávkování antibiotic u kriticky nemocných s potřebou náhrady funkce ledvin - složitá teorie, empirická praxe. Postgraduální nefrologie 2011; IX (3): 41-44. Go to original source...
  11. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, et al. Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the second international consensus conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) group. Crit Care 2004; 8: 204-212. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Choi G, Gomersall CH, Tian Q, Joynt GM, Freebairn R, Lipman J. Principles of antibacterial dosing in continuous renal replacement therapy. Crit Care Med 2009; 37 (7): 2268-2282. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Schentag JJ. Antimicrobial action and pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamics: the use of AUIC to improve efficacy and avoid resistance. J Chemother 1999; 11 (6): 426-439. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Schück O, Teplan V, Marečková O, Skibová J, Stollová M. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate based on the modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation in patients with chronic renal failure. Kidney Blood Pres Res 2005; 28 (1): 63-67. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Liu KD, Himmelfarb J, Paganini E, et al. Timing of initiation of dialysis in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1: 915-919. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kuang D, Verbine A, Ronco C. Pahrmacokinetics and antimicrobial dosing adjustment in critically ill patients during continuous renal replacement therapy. Clinical Nephrology 2007; 67: 267-284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Uchino S, Cole L, Morimatsu H, Goldsmith D, Bellomo R. Clearance of vancomycin during high-volume haemofiltration: impact of pre-dilution. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 1664-1667. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Jun M, Lambers Heerspink HJ, Ninomiya T, et al. Intensities of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 956-963. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Kellum JA, Ronco C. Dialysis: results of RENAL-what is the optimal CRRT target dose? Nature Reviews Nephrology 2010; 6: 191-192. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Tonelli M, Manns B, Feller-Kopman D. Acute renal failure in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the impact of dialytic modality on mortality and renal recovery. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 875-885. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Rodvold KA, Blum RA, Fischer JH, et al. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients with various degrees of renal function. Antimicrob Agents Chemotherapy 1988; 32: 848-852. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Bouman CSC, van Kan HJM, Koopmans RP, Korevaar JC, Schultz MJ, Vroom MB. Discrepancies between observed and predicted continuous venovenous hemofiltration removal of antimicrobial agents in critically ill patients and the effects on dosing. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32: 2013-2019. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Decker BS, Kays MB, Chambers M, Kraus MA, Moe SM, Sowinski KM. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during short daily hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 1981-1987. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.