Klin Farmakol Farm. 2026;40(2):92-96 | DOI: 10.36290/far.2026.017

Clinical trials: The evolution of the traditional phase-based approach in contemporary clinical research

Lenka Součková1, 2, Veronika Kunešová1, Adriána Papiež1, Hana Blahynková1
1 CZECRIN, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
2 Centrum klinických studií, Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně

Clinical trials represent a key component of the development of medicinal products and a fundamental source of evidence for evidence-based medicine. Traditionally, the clinical development of medicines has been described through four sequential phases of clinical trials (I-IV), reflecting the stepwise evaluation of safety, dosing, efficacy, and post-marketing surveillance after a medicinal product is introduced to the market. This model has long served as both a regulatory and educational framework for clinical research. However, in recent decades the clinical development of medicines has undergone significant changes. In practice, sub-phases of clinical trials (e.g., Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb) and combined study designs that integrate multiple phases of develop­ment (e.g., phase I/II or II/III trials) are increasingly used. At the same time, innovative approaches to clinical trial design are emerging, including adaptive, seamless, and platform trials, while the use of real-world evidence is gaining importance. A specific area of development involves advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), such as gene and cell therapies, where clinical development is often conducted in smaller patient populations and, in some cases, regulatory approval may be based on early-phase clinical studies. The aim of this article is to present the traditional concept of clinical trial phases, discuss its limitations, and highlight current trends in clinical research that illustrate the transition from a rigid linear model to a more flexible and continuous approach to clinical drug development.

Keywords: clinical trials, clinical trial phases, drug development, ATMP, adaptive design.

Received: March 23, 2026; Revised: May 4, 2026; Accepted: May 6, 2026; Published: July 1, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Součková L, Kunešová V, Papiež A, Blahynková H. Clinical trials: The evolution of the traditional phase-based approach in contemporary clinical research. Klin Farmakol Farm. 2026;40(2):92-96. doi: 10.36290/far.2026.017.
Download citation

References

  1. Harrer S, Shah P, Antony B, et al. Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Trial Design. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40(8): 577-591. Go to original source...
  2. Eichler HG, Abadie E, Raine JM, et al. Safe Drugs and the Cost of Good Intentions. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1378-1380. Go to original source...
  3. Hanna E, Rémuzat C, Auquier P, et al. Advanced therapy medicinal products: current and future perspectives. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2016;4(1):31036. Go to original source...
  4. Eichler HG, Bloechl-Daum B, Abadie E, et al. Relative efficacy of drugs: an emerging issue between regulatory agencies and third-party payers. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(4):277-291. Go to original source...
  5. Wong CH, Siah KW, Lo AW. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics. 2019;20(2):273-286. Go to original source...
  6. Dal-Ré R, Caplan AL, Gluud C, et al. Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding the Early Approval and Deployment of a COVID-19 Vaccine. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(2): 258-260. Go to original source...
  7. Ekins S, Puhl AC, Zorn KM, et al. Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development. Nat Mater. 2019;18(5):435-441. Go to original source...
  8. ICH. M3(R2) Nonclinical safety studies for the conduct of human clinical trials and marketing authorization for pharmaceuticals [Internet]. EMA; 2009. Available from: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/M3_R2__Guideline.pdf.
  9. Kummar S, Rubinstein L, Kinders R, et al. Phase 0 Clinical Trials: Conceptions and Misconceptions. Cancer J. 2008;14(3):133-137. Go to original source...
  10. Murgo AJ, Kummar S, Rubinstein L, et al. Designing Phase 0 Cancer Clinical Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(12):3675-3682. Go to original source...
  11. Shen J, Swift B, Mamelok R, et al. Design and Conduct Considerations for First-in-Human Trials. Clin Transl Sci. 2019;12(1):6-19. Go to original source...
  12. Van Norman GA. Phase II Trials in Drug Development and Adaptive Trial Design. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019;4(3):428-437. Go to original source...
  13. Concato J, Corrigan-Curay J. Real-World Evidence - Where Are We Now? N Engl J Med. 2022;386(18):1680-1682. Go to original source...
  14. Onakpoya IJ, Heneghan CJ, Aronson JK. Post-marketing withdrawal of 462 medicinal products because of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review of the world literature. BMC Med. 2016;14(1):10. Go to original source...
  15. Iglesias-Lopez C, Obach M, Vallano A, et al. Comparison of regulatory pathways for the approval of advanced therapies in the European Union and the United States. Cytotherapy. 2021;23(3):261-274. Go to original source...
  16. Kočí Z, Boráň T, Krůpa P, et al. The Current State of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in the Czech Republic. Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev. 2018;29(3):132-147. Go to original source...
  17. ICH. E8(R1) General considerations for clinical studies [Internet]. EMA; 2021. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-e8-general-considerations-clinical-studies-scientific-guideline.
  18. Subbiah V. The next generation of evidence-based medicine. Nat Med. 2023;29(1):49-58. Go to original source...




Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.