Klin Farmakol Farm. 2008;22(4):145-148

Pharmacological prevention of bleeding at caesarean section

Antonín Pařízek
Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze

During Caesarean sections, a blood loss of less than 1000 mL can be considered appropriate. The incidence of serious forms of excessive postpartum bleeding, i.e., of those associated with increased maternal mortality or significant morbidity (a blood loss greater than 1500 mL at Caesarean section), is reported to be 1/1000 and 3.5–5/1000 live births in developed and developing countries, respectively. In developing countries, more than 100,000 women die from this obstetric complication every year. The introduction of the prophylactic administration of uterotonic drugs during the third stage of labour results, even in the case of a Caesarean section, in a decrease in blood loss by more than 40%, and thus significantly reduces the need for blood substitutes in the intra- and postoperative period; therefore, it is generally recommended. Oxytocin is a uterotonic agent routinely administered to prevent uterine atony. Carbetocin, a novel synthetic analogue of oxytocin, has a four to ten times longer half-life (40 mins) compared to oxytocin and can be used in a one-time intravenous injection. Carbetocin can also be given intramuscularly. There is evidence of a higher efficacy of an intravenous injection of 100 μg of carbetocin on myometrial retraction at Caesarean section as compared to an 8-hour IV infusion of oxytocin. In terms of adverse effects, the novel uterotonic agent is well tolerated and combines the safety of oxytocin with the long-lasting action of ergot alkaloids. When available, carbetocin should be used as the drug of choice to prevent postpartum uterine hypotony/atony at Caesarean section.

Keywords: Key words: Caesarean section, obstetric hemorrhage, uterine contraction, carbetocin, oxytocin.

Published: January 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pařízek A. Pharmacological prevention of bleeding at caesarean section. Klin Farmakol Farm. 2008;22(4):145-148.
Download citation

References

  1. Deneux-Tharaux C, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle MH, Breart G. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 541-548. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Rossi AC, D'Addario V. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol Sept. 2008, 224-231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. van Bogaert LJ. Mode of delivery after one cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 87: 9-13. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Spaans WA, Sluijs MB, van Roosmalen J, Bleker OP. Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 100: 163-166. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: A meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 465-470.
  6. Schuurmans N, MacKinnon C, Lane C, Etches D. Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage, SOGC clinical praktice guidelines, 2000; 88: 1-11.
  7. Akrivis CH, Varras M, Bellou A, et al. Primary postpartum haemorrhage due to a large nonpedunculated sterine leiomyoma: a case report and review of the literature. Clin.Exp.Obstet.Gynecol. 2003; 30 (2-3): 156-158. Go to PubMed...
  8. Lejnem K, Amant F, Debiec-Rychter M, et al. Endometrial stroma sarcoma presenting as postpartum haemorrhage: report of a case with a sole t (10,17) (q22,p13) translocation. Gynecol. Oncol., 2003; 91 (1): 265-271. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Zelop C, Nadel A, Frigoletto FD, et al. Placenta accreta/percreta/increta: a cause of elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Oct; 80 (4): 693-694. Go to PubMed...
  10. Davies S. Amniotic fluid embolism and isolated disseminated intravascular coagulation. Can.J. Anaesth., 1999; 46 (5): 456-459. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Nicholson JM, Parry S, Caughey AB. The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 511.e1-511.e15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Gulmezoglu AM, Viklat J, Noc NT, et al. WHO multicentre randomised trial of misoprostol in the management of the third stage of labour. Lancet, 2001; 1, 358: 689-695. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Dansereau J, et al. Double-blind comparison of carbetocin versus oxytocin in prevention of uterine atony after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, Volume 180, Number 3, Part 1, 670-676. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Prendiville WJP, Elbourne D, McDonald SJ Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour (Review). The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 2. Go to original source...
  15. Sweeney G, Holbrook AM, Levine M, et al. Pharmacokinetics of carbetocin, a long-acting oxitocin analogue, in nonpregnant women. Curr Ther Res 1990; 47: 528-540.
  16. Su LL, Chong YS, Samuel M. Oxytocin agonists for preventing postpartum haemorrhage (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; Jul 18 (3): CD005457. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Monografie - Obstetric Evidence Based Guidelines, Edited by Berghella, Informa health 2007, 96.
  18. Diagnostika a léčba akutního peripartálního život ohrožujícího krvácení - doporučený postup (schváleno odbornými společnostmi (ČGPS, ČHS, ČSTH, ČSARIM, ČSIM), 2008, www.porodnice.cz -> Lékaři.




Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.