Klin Farmakol Farm. 2020;34(1):4-8 | DOI: 10.36290/far.2020.002

Drug allergies and quality of taken medican history in hospitalized patients

Kateřina Pospíšilíková, Veronika Glumbíková, Jan Strojil
Ústav farmakologie, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci

Introduction: Drug allergies may complicate choice of pharmacotherapy. In the case of an invalid of false-positive allergy history the patient may be exposed to second-line drugs that may present higher risk of side effects or increase cost of care.

Methods: Prospective analysis of health records of hospitalized patients followed by a structured interview with detailed history. Between 11/2018 and 4/2019 we examined 92 hospitalized patients at selected clinics of the University Hospital in Olomouc.

Results: The prevalence of drug allergies in our sample of hospitalized patients was 21.2%. In 92 patients we identified a total of 163 drug allergies (a mean of 1.8 allergy per patient). The most common manifestations were cutaneous (39% of reactions) and gastrointestinal (16%). Allergies to antimicrobial agents were most commonly reported (36%), followed by analgesics (16%), iodine (11%) and local anesthetics (7%). Betalactam antibiotics (55%) and sulfonamides (24%) were the most common antibiotics with reported allergies. In 10% of reported allergies a mismatch between the patients history and his documentation was identified. Approximately 18% of reactions were evaluated by the authors to be likely non-allergic adverse effects.

Conclusion: The prevalence of drug allergies among hospitalized patients is high, the most commonly reported drugs are antibiotics and analgesics. Validity of allergic history is key for rational and safe pharmacotherapy. Effort should be made to properly verify and document any drug allergies and intolerance.

Keywords: drug allergies, history, antibiotics, analgesics, rational pharmacotherapy, drug safety.

Published: April 8, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pospíšilíková K, Glumbíková V, Strojil J. Drug allergies and quality of taken medican history in hospitalized patients. Klin Farmakol Farm. 2020;34(1):4-8. doi: 10.36290/far.2020.002.
Download citation

References

  1. Braunová J. Léková alergie. Interní Med, 2002; (4)7: 344-346.
  2. Jarvis D. Burney P. The epidemiology of allergic disease. BMJ, 1998; (316)7131: 607-610. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Demoly P, et al. International Consensus on drug allergy. Allergy. 2014; (69)4: 420-437. Go to original source...
  4. Sastre J, Manso L, Sanchez‑García S, Fernández‑Nieto M, Medical and economic impact of misdiagnosis of drug hypersensitivity in hospitalized patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012; (129)2: 566-567. Go to original source...
  5. Lee CE, et al. The Incidence of Antimicrobial Allergies in Hospitalized Patients: Implications Regarding Prescribing Patterns and Emerging Bacterial Resistance. Arch. Intern. Med., 2000; (160)18: 2819-2822. Go to original source...
  6. Lutomski DM, LaFollette JA, Biaglow MA, Haglund LA. Antibiotic Allergies in the Medical Record: Effect on Drug Selection and Assessment of Validity, Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 01-Nov-2008. https://accpjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1592/phco.28. 11. 1348 (accessed Jul. 10, 2019) Go to original source...
  7. Demoly P, Bousquet J. Epidemiology of drug allergy Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2001; (1)4: 305-310. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Zambonino MA, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to beta‑lactam antibiotics in a large population of children," Pediatr. Allergy Immunol., 2014; (25)1: 80-87. Go to original source...
  9. Gomes ER, Demoly P. Epidemiology of hypersensitivity drug reactions. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 2005; (5)4: 309-316. Go to original source...
  10. Demoly P, Kropf R, Bircher A, Pichler WJ. Drug hypersensitivity: questionnaire. EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity. Allergy, 1999; (54)9: 999-1003. Go to original source...
  11. Sousa‑Pinto B, Fonseca JA, Gomes ER. Frequency of self‑reported drug allergy: A systematic review and meta‑analysis with meta‑regression. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Allergy Asthma Immunol., 2017; 119(4): 362-373.e2.
  12. Tamayo E, et al. Self‑reported drug allergies and the diagnostic work‑up in the surgical population. J. Eval. Clin. Pract., 2010; (16)5: 902-904. Go to original source...
  13. Bavbek S, Erkekol FÖ, Celik GE, Gönüllü I, Misirligil Z. Self‑reported prevalence of hypersensitivity reactions against drugs among medical students: does awareness cause any difference? Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf., 2011; (20)2: 154-161. Go to original source...
  14. Rubio M, Bousquet PJ, Gomes E, Romano A, Demoly P. Results of drug hypersensitivity evaluations in a large group of children and adults. Clin. Exp. Allergy J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 2012; 42(1): 123-130. Go to original source...
  15. Harandian F, Pham D, Ben‑Shoshan M. Positive penicillin allergy testing results: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of papers published from 2010 through 2015," Postgrad. Med., 2016; (128)6: 557-562. Go to original source...
  16. Panagioti M, et al.Association Between Physician Burnout and Patient Safety, Professionalism, and Patient Satisfaction: A Systematic Review and Meta‑analysis, JAMA Intern. Med., 2018; (178)10: 1317-1330. Go to original source...
  17. Naranjo CA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 1981; (30)2: 239-245. Go to original source...
  18. Garvey LH, et al. The use of drug provocation testing in the investigation of suspected immediate perioperative allergic reactions: current status. Br. J. Anaesth., 2019; (123)1: e126-e134. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.